

-
It is more expensive to build - High buildings have no genuine advantages except in speculative gains.
-
Consumes more energy in use
-
Is less successful in providing the right conditions for a sense of community
-
Generally fails to provide an attractive and vibrant form at street level and separates residents from street life.
-
Creates ambiguous intermediate space between the public street and private front door
-
Cannot be easily adapted to other uses
-
Provides inadequate outside private amenity space
-
Destroy townscape and social life,
-
Promote crime
-
Make life difficult for children
-
Expensive to maintain
-
High rise can wreck open space and reduce direct sunlight
-
Damage light and views.
-
Identity can be lost in high rise living.
-
Loss of the human scale
-
High rise sprawl takes up too much vertical space. Not unlike suburban sprawl that promotes isolation and is often devoid of people on the streets.
-
Tall buildings inflate the price of adjacent land, thus making the protection of historic buildings and affordable housing less achievable. In this way, they increase inequality.
-
High-rise buildings are not green as they are subject to the effects of too much sun and too much wind on their all-glass skins. And all-glass skins are, despite many improvements to the technology, inherently inefficient. Glass is simply not very good at keeping excessive heat out, or desirable heat in. (Loomans, 2014)
-
Overcrowded cities can lead to stress and poor health
-
Social problems are both created and exacerbated by these dysfunctional environments.
-
More pedestrian casualties,
-
Urban heat island
-
Waste and litter issues
-
Poor ecosystem quality
-
Loss of privacy
-
Reductions in physical and/or mental wellbeing.
-
Enrich issues of wellbeing
-
Support better and cheaper public transport
-
Promote greater energy efficiency of buildings
-
Create more opportunities for mixed tenure housing and engendering social equality
-
Make more efficient use of land
-
Increase profits of an area of land,
-
Make efficient use of existing resources creating critical mass to justify and support service provision. (Boyko, 2014)
-
Minimise average trip lengths
-
Maximise level of accessibility
-
Increase the amount of active travel
-
Make shops and services viable
-
Permit diversity of residential character in every neighbourhood and allow choice and diversity of house types,
-
Facilitate open space network, biodiversity and access to open country through retrofit
-
Facilitate renewables
-
Support the viability of combined heat and power by linear concentration of demand.
-
Allow a flexible response to the landscape and existing character of the area, contributing to visual coherence and legibility.
Advantages and disadvantages
Intensified urban environments

Advantages
