top of page
  • It is more expensive to build - High buildings have no genuine advantages except in speculative gains.

  • Consumes more energy in use

  • Is less successful in providing the right conditions for a sense of community

  • Generally fails to provide an attractive and vibrant form at street level and separates residents from street life.

  • Creates ambiguous intermediate space between the public street and private front door

  • Cannot be easily adapted to other uses

  • Provides inadequate outside private amenity space

  • Destroy townscape and social life,

  • Promote crime

  • Make life difficult for children

  • Expensive to maintain

  • High rise can wreck open space and reduce direct sunlight

  • Damage light and views.

  • Identity can be lost in high rise living.

  • Loss of the human scale 

  • High rise sprawl takes up too much vertical space. Not unlike suburban sprawl that promotes isolation and is often devoid of people on the streets.

  • Tall buildings inflate the price of adjacent land, thus making the protection of historic buildings and affordable housing less achievable. In this way, they increase inequality.

  • High-rise buildings are not green as they are subject to the effects of too much sun and too much wind on their all-glass skins. And all-glass skins are, despite many improvements to the technology, inherently inefficient. Glass is simply not very good at keeping excessive heat out, or desirable heat in. (Loomans, 2014)

  • Overcrowded cities can lead to stress and poor health

  • Social problems are both created and exacerbated by these dysfunctional environments.

  • More pedestrian casualties,

  • Urban heat island

  • Waste and litter issues

  • Poor ecosystem quality

  • Loss of privacy

  • Reductions in physical and/or mental wellbeing.

  • Enrich issues of wellbeing

  • Support better and cheaper public transport

  • Promote greater energy efficiency of buildings

  • Create more opportunities for mixed tenure housing and engendering social equality

  • Make more efficient use of land

  • Increase profits of an area of land,

  • Make efficient use of existing resources creating critical mass to justify and support service provision. (Boyko, 2014)

  • Minimise average trip lengths

  • Maximise level of accessibility

  • Increase the amount of active travel

  • Make shops and services viable

  • Permit diversity of residential character in every neighbourhood and allow choice and diversity of house types,

  • Facilitate open space network, biodiversity and access to open country through retrofit

  • Facilitate renewables

  • Support the viability of combined heat and power by linear concentration of demand.

  • Allow a flexible response to the landscape and existing character of the area, contributing to visual coherence and legibility.

Advantages and disadvantages

Intensified urban environments
Advantages 
Disadvantages

© 2024 by Rachel Noke Designs. Proudly created with Wix.com

  • facebook
  • Twitter Round
  • googleplus
  • flickr
bottom of page